1 2025:CGHC:51419 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12009 of 2025 1 - Renuka Chandrakar W/o Surajkumar Chandrakar Aged About 42 Years R/o Post Bemcha, Tehsil- Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - The Member Secretary Divisional Rationalization Hearing Samiti-Cum- Joint Director, Education Division, Integrated Education Premises, First Floor, Pension Bada, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 7 - The State Level Rationalization Committee Government Of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gourav Singhal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 15/10 /2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already preferred representation before the State Level Rationalization Committee raising her grievance. He would further submit that this petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue representation already pending before the State Level Committee as well as to file afresh representation before the Committee and a direction may kindly be issued to the respondent authorities to decide the same. ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.16 12:02:15 +0530 2 2. Prayer made by the petitioner is just and proper. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. 4. The State Level Rationalization Committee is directed to decide appeal already preferred by the petitioner as well as the fresh representation submitted by the petitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun