Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51585 (AP)

CHUNDURU VASU v. SESHIBHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/2087/2025 · 2025-11-05

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010402832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2087/2025 Between: 1. CHUNDURU VASU, S/O.NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O.KOTHAPETA GRAM PANCHAYAT, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SESHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. NILAM SAWHNEY IAS, THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 1ST FLOOR, NEW HODS BUILDING, MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA 3. SRI J VENKATA MURALI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM- DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT ( ERST WHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take to cognizance offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 3.01.2025 passed in W.P No. 19948 of 2021 and such other order or orders as deem fit in the interest of the justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 2. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2087 of 2025 ORDER: This Court vide order dated 03.01.2025 in W.P.No.19948 of 2021 directed the respondent authorities to hold election for the Kothapeta Gram Panchayat, as soon as possible, not later than six (06) months. Additionally, respondent No.1 is directed to provide the State Election Commission with full support and cooperation in order to guarantee the holding of a free and fair election. 2. Accordingly, respondent No.1 issued G.O.Ms.No.85, dated 29.09.2025, and the respondents have duly complied with the orders of this Court. 3. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Hence, this Court dismissed the Contempt Case with costs of Rs.50,000/- payable to the Andhra Pradesh High Court Advocates Association. Subsequently, learned counsel for petitioner represented and requested to reduce the amount. 4. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is dismissed with costs of Rs.3000/- (Rupees three thousand only) payable to the Andhra Pradesh High Court Advocates Association within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.11.2025 KBN 4 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.2087 of 2025 06.11.2025 KKBBNN