SURISETTY SATYANARAYANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/29030/2023 · 2025-12-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51582 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51582 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010559752023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29030/2023 Between:
1. SURISETTY SATYANARAYANA, S/O PATTALLAIAH , AGED 45 YRS , SIMHADRI CIVIL TECHNOLOGIES D.NO.46-22-44, 1ST FLOOR, KALYANI ESTATES, OPP.RAILWAY HOSPITAL, RAILWAY STTAION ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DUVVADA POLICE STATION , DUVVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SRI B SRINIVASA RAO, INSPECTOR OF POLICE (C.I.,) , DUVVADA POLICE STATION , DUVVADA VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. P BABURAO, S/O APPARAO. , AGED 45 YRS OCC.SECURITY GUARD , SF-1 , SAI CHANDANA ARCADE, GALLAVANIPALEM, ROAD NO.1, AGANAMPUDI , VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. SRI P VEERABHADRA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 50 YRS , OCC.AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD
D.N0.49-34-22 AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.16
7. SRI K SHYAM KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 48 YRS , OCC.
CEO OF KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD , D.N0.49- 34-22 AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.16
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to pass an Order to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the Action of the Respondent Police particularly the Respondent No.3 and 4 an Official Capacity as well as an personal capacity by interferring into the Civil Dispute in between the Petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 6 and 7 in Connection with the Building Sai Chandana Arcade (Apartment) particularly a Flat No.SF-1 even though the Dispute in connection with the taking of Possession of Flat SF-1 Sai Chandana Arcade , Aganampudi, Viakhapatnam in view of the Orders in W.P. No.6249/2023 , inspite of petitioner notice to the Respondent Police dt.27-10-2023 even then the R-3 and R-4 Calling the petitioner and harassing Continuously through a police men as well as Calling through R-4 mobile No.9440796053 all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violation of Specified Procedure under the law as well as guidelines of Apex Court, Violation of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India Consequently to direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to Interfere into Civil Dispute in between the petitioner as well as the Respondent Bank in connection with the Possession/Re-possession of Flat SF-1 Chandana Arcade, Aganampudi, Visakhapatnam in the interest of the justice.
and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to pass an Order to Direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to Call for the Petitioner to the Duvvada Police Station nor to harass the petitioner nor interferring in connection with the Flat SF-1 Sai Chandana Arcade, Aganampudi, Visakhapatnam in view of the Petitioner obtained an Order in W.P. No.6249/2023 of High Court of A.P., including proceedings of Contempt of Court pending against R-6 andR-7 due to non complying the orders in W.P. No.6249/2023 disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of the justice. pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29030/2023
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the Action of the Respondent Police particularly the Respondent No.3 and 4 an Official Capacity as well as an personal capacity by interferring into the Civil Dispute in between the Petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 6 and 7 in Connection with the Building Sai Chandana Arcade (Apartment) particularly a Flat No.SF-1 even though the Dispute in connection with the taking of Possession of Flat SF-1 Sai Chandana Arcade , Aganampudi, Viakhapatnam in view of the Orders in W.P. No.6249/2023 , inspite of petitioner notice to the Respondent Police dt.27-10-2023 even then the R-3 and R-4 Calling the petitioner and harassing Continuously through a police men as well as Calling through R-4 mobile No.9440796053 all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violation of Specified Procedure under the law as well as guidelines of Apex Court, Violation of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India Consequently to direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to Interfere into Civil Dispute in between the petitioner as well as the Respondent Bank in connection with the Possession/Re- possession of Flat SF-1 Chandana Arcade, Aganampudi, Visakhapatnam in the interest of the justice. and to pass..…”
2. Heard Sri R siva sai swarup, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and never called the petitioner to the police station.
5. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 08.12.2025 KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
295
WRIT PETITION NO: 29030/2023
Dated 08.12.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 29030/2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
2.
08.12.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV