CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 212 Suhail State of Haryana CORAM: Present: SUMEET GOEL 1. Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’ for grant of No.19 dated Sections 318(4) of BNS, 2. complainant namely No. 477, HUDA, Sector fraudulent withdrawals from his joint account (No.0360009 maintained with his wife, Smt. Sumitra Yadav, at Punjab National Bank, Branch New Mandi, Narnaul. complainant 12:58 PM and 9782238028 at 3:09 PM requesting payment of loan interest. The that he had already made advance payments toward the loan and -22968-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH V/s State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. G.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAGG Haryana. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’ for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR dated 16.09.2024, registered for the offences punishable under 318(4) of BNS, at Police Station The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the complainant namely Udai Singh, son of Shri Tulsi Ram and resident of Plot No. 477, HUDA, Sector-1, Narnaul, filed a written complaint concerning fraudulent withdrawals from his joint account (No.0360009 maintained with his wife, Smt. Sumitra Yadav, at Punjab National Bank, Branch New Mandi, Narnaul. He alleged that on complainant received calls from two mobile numbers 12:58 PM and 9782238028 at 3:09 PM requesting payment of loan interest. The that he had already made advance payments toward the loan and 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22968-2025 Date of decision: 03.07.202 ....Petitioner ....Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL G.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAGG Haryana. ***** Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’ bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR , registered for the offences punishable under at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Narnaul. The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the Udai Singh, son of Shri Tulsi Ram and resident of Plot 1, Narnaul, filed a written complaint concerning fraudulent withdrawals from his joint account (No.0360009900000377) maintained with his wife, Smt. Sumitra Yadav, at Punjab National Bank, He alleged that on 31.08.2024, the received calls from two mobile numbers i.e. 9306038251 at purportedly from a bank official, requesting payment of loan interest. The complainant informed the caller that he had already made advance payments toward the loan and as such .2025 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’) bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR , registered for the offences punishable under Cyber Police Station, Narnaul. The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the Udai Singh, son of Shri Tulsi Ram and resident of Plot 1, Narnaul, filed a written complaint concerning 900000377) maintained with his wife, Smt. Sumitra Yadav, at Punjab National Bank, 31.08.2024, the 9306038251 at tedly from a bank official, informed the caller as such no AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- interest was due. The caller been withdrawn from the loan account to visit the branch. the complainant ₹25,00,000. three transactions of recorded on 09.08.2024, and two additional transactions of (one via RTGS and one via IMPS) were recorded on 10.08.2024. These withdrawals were carried out without complainant further account and suspects that the amount was fraudulently withdrawn by unidentified individuals. the Branch Manager of Punjab National Bank, Narnaul, and an online complaint (No. 21309240036593 dated 03.09.2024) was also filed the Cyber Crime portal. On these set of allegations, instant FIR under Sections 318(4) of th 3. fraudulent transactions took place on or before 31.08.2024, whereas the complainant lodged the complaint on the Cyber Portal only on 03. and no plausible explanation has been provided for this delay, which casts doubt on the veracity of the complaint. Learned counsel asserts that the instant FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the petitioner has not been named as an allegations made against him. Learned counsel has further iterated that the petitioner has been suffering from neurological and psychiatric disorders -22968-2025 interest was due. The caller thereafter alleged that the amount had already ithdrawn from the loan account and, thus, to visit the branch. Upon examination of the account statement at the bank, complainant discovered unauthorized debit transactions 25,00,000. It has been further alleged by the complainant that s three transactions of ₹5,00,000 each (two via RTGS and one via IMPS) were orded on 09.08.2024, and two additional transactions of (one via RTGS and one via IMPS) were recorded on 10.08.2024. These thdrawals were carried out without complainant further stated that he does not use internet banking for this account and suspects that the amount was fraudulently withdrawn by unidentified individuals. Accordingly, a the Branch Manager of Punjab National Bank, Narnaul, and an online complaint (No. 21309240036593 dated 03.09.2024) was also filed the Cyber Crime portal. On these set of allegations, instant FIR under Sections 318(4) of the BNS, 2023 was registered and investigation ensued. Learned counsel for the petitioner iterated that the fraudulent transactions took place on or before 31.08.2024, whereas the complainant lodged the complaint on the Cyber Portal only on 03. and no plausible explanation has been provided for this delay, which casts doubt on the veracity of the complaint. Learned counsel asserts that the instant FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the petitioner has not been named as an accused in the FIR and hence there is not direct allegations made against him. Learned counsel has further iterated that the petitioner has been suffering from neurological and psychiatric disorders 2 alleged that the amount had already and, thus, prompting the complainant Upon examination of the account statement at the bank, discovered unauthorized debit transactions amounting to by the complainant that specifically, 5,00,000 each (two via RTGS and one via IMPS) were orded on 09.08.2024, and two additional transactions of ₹5,00,000 each (one via RTGS and one via IMPS) were recorded on 10.08.2024. These thdrawals were carried out without his knowledge or consent. The stated that he does not use internet banking for this account and suspects that the amount was fraudulently withdrawn by Accordingly, a formal complaint was lodged with the Branch Manager of Punjab National Bank, Narnaul, and an online complaint (No. 21309240036593 dated 03.09.2024) was also filed through the Cyber Crime portal. On these set of allegations, instant FIR under e BNS, 2023 was registered and investigation ensued. Learned counsel for the petitioner iterated that the alleged fraudulent transactions took place on or before 31.08.2024, whereas the complainant lodged the complaint on the Cyber Portal only on 03.09.2024 and no plausible explanation has been provided for this delay, which casts doubt on the veracity of the complaint. Learned counsel asserts that the instant FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the petitioner accused in the FIR and hence there is not direct allegations made against him. Learned counsel has further iterated that the petitioner has been suffering from neurological and psychiatric disorders alleged that the amount had already complainant Upon examination of the account statement at the bank, amounting to pecifically, 5,00,000 each (two via RTGS and one via IMPS) were 5,00,000 each (one via RTGS and one via IMPS) were recorded on 10.08.2024. These The stated that he does not use internet banking for this account and suspects that the amount was fraudulently withdrawn by omplaint was lodged with the Branch Manager of Punjab National Bank, Narnaul, and an online through the Cyber Crime portal. On these set of allegations, instant FIR under e BNS, 2023 was registered and investigation ensued. alleged fraudulent transactions took place on or before 31.08.2024, whereas the 09.2024 and no plausible explanation has been provided for this delay, which casts doubt on the veracity of the complaint. Learned counsel asserts that the instant FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the petitioner accused in the FIR and hence there is not direct allegations made against him. Learned counsel has further iterated that the petitioner has been suffering from neurological and psychiatric disorders AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- since the year 2017 and is currently under medical trea has been annexed as Annexure P learned counsel, owing to mental health condition of the petitioner, he has been unable to manage or open a bank account independently. A close relative, who is petitioner by opening a bank account in his name and registering his own mobile number for operating the same. counsel that the petitioner has no knowledg funds in his account which is being solely operated by the co maintained possession of the cheque book, passbook, ATM card and also had access to internet banking. petitioner to the alleged offence. Learned counsel asserts that the petitioner is an innocent individual who has been wrongfully accused of an offence he never committed. Moreover, the present FIR against the petitioner as there misappropriation directly attributable to him. Learned counsel asserts that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner and hence his custodi interrogation is neither necessary nor justified. Furthermore the petitioner is merely 22 years old and incarceration at this young age, particularly under the present circumstances, would cause irreversible damage to his career and future prospects. petitioner is ready fully cooperate with the Investigating Agency. -22968-2025 since the year 2017 and is currently under medical trea has been annexed as Annexure P-2 with the instant petition. According to learned counsel, owing to mental health condition of the petitioner, he has been unable to manage or open a bank account independently. A close relative, who is a co-accused in this case, exploited the vulnerability of the petitioner by opening a bank account in his name and registering his own mobile number for operating the same. It is further submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner has no knowledg funds in his account which is being solely operated by the co maintained possession of the cheque book, passbook, ATM card and also had access to internet banking. Therefore, it is highly improbable to link the etitioner to the alleged offence. Learned counsel asserts that the petitioner is an innocent individual who has been wrongfully accused of an offence he never committed. Moreover, the present FIR against the petitioner as there is no allegation of embezzlement or misappropriation directly attributable to him. Learned counsel asserts that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner and hence his custodi interrogation is neither necessary nor justified. Furthermore the petitioner is merely 22 years old and incarceration at this young age, particularly under the present circumstances, would cause irreversible damage to his career and future prospects. It is next submitted petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation fully cooperate with the Investigating Agency. 3 since the year 2017 and is currently under medical treatment, copy whereof 2 with the instant petition. According to learned counsel, owing to mental health condition of the petitioner, he has been unable to manage or open a bank account independently. A close accused in this case, exploited the vulnerability of the petitioner by opening a bank account in his name and registering his own It is further submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner has no knowledge about the alleged credit of funds in his account which is being solely operated by the co-accused, who maintained possession of the cheque book, passbook, ATM card and also Therefore, it is highly improbable to link the etitioner to the alleged offence. Learned counsel asserts that the petitioner is an innocent individual who has been wrongfully accused of an offence he never committed. Moreover, the present FIR is not legally maintainable is no allegation of embezzlement or misappropriation directly attributable to him. Learned counsel asserts that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner and hence his custodi interrogation is neither necessary nor justified. Furthermore the petitioner is merely 22 years old and incarceration at this young age, particularly under the present circumstances, would cause irreversible damage to his career and is next submitted by the learned counsel that the to join the investigation and undertakes to fully cooperate with the Investigating Agency. On the basis of the tment, copy whereof 2 with the instant petition. According to learned counsel, owing to mental health condition of the petitioner, he has been unable to manage or open a bank account independently. A close accused in this case, exploited the vulnerability of the petitioner by opening a bank account in his name and registering his own It is further submitted by the learned e about the alleged credit of accused, who maintained possession of the cheque book, passbook, ATM card and also Therefore, it is highly improbable to link the etitioner to the alleged offence. Learned counsel asserts that the petitioner is an innocent individual who has been wrongfully accused of an offence he is not legally maintainable is no allegation of embezzlement or misappropriation directly attributable to him. Learned counsel asserts that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner and hence his custodial interrogation is neither necessary nor justified. Furthermore the petitioner is merely 22 years old and incarceration at this young age, particularly under the present circumstances, would cause irreversible damage to his career and that the and undertakes to On the basis of the AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- aforementioned submissions, the grant of the instant petition and the petitioner 4. anticipatory bail to the petitioner by arguing that the offence committed by the petitioner is serious in nature. He submits that the misappropriated amount, specifically a sum of traced to Union Bank Account No. 207722010001791, which stands in the name of the applicant these incriminating financial trails and the seriousness of the allegations, the custodial interrogation of the investigation. unravel the broader conspiracy, identify the co defrauded amount. cyber financial fraud involved, asserting that releasing the at this crucial stage may hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially lead to tampering with evidence or influencing of witnesses. prayer has bee facilitate effective investigation into the alleged offence. 5. gone through the available record of the case. 6. serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. The FIR was lodged on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant namely Udai Singh with regard to from the record -22968-2025 aforementioned submissions, the grant of the instant petition petitioner be granted the concession of the Conversely, learned State counsel anticipatory bail to the petitioner by arguing that the offence committed by the petitioner is serious in nature. He submits that the misappropriated amount, specifically a sum of o Union Bank Account No. 207722010001791, which stands in the name of the applicant-accused. He has these incriminating financial trails and the seriousness of the allegations, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is imperative for a fair and thorough investigation. According to him, the custodial unravel the broader conspiracy, identify the co defrauded amount. He has further emphasized cyber financial fraud involved, asserting that releasing the at this crucial stage may hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially lead to tampering with evidence or influencing of witnesses. prayer has been made for the dismissal facilitate effective investigation into the alleged offence. I have heard the learned counsel for the gone through the available record of the case. As per the case put forth in the FIR in question, indubitably, serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. The FIR was lodged on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant namely Udai Singh with regard to cyber financial fraud from the record that the petitioner, in connivance with co 4 aforementioned submissions, the grant of the instant petition is entreated for concession of the anticipatory bail. Conversely, learned State counsel has opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner by arguing that the offence committed by the petitioner is serious in nature. He submits that a substantial portion of the misappropriated amount, specifically a sum of ₹10,00,000/- has been o Union Bank Account No. 207722010001791, which stands in the He has further contended that in light of these incriminating financial trails and the seriousness of the allegations, the is imperative for a fair and thorough According to him, the custodial interrogation is essential to unravel the broader conspiracy, identify the co-conspirators, and recover the emphasized that the complexity of the cyber financial fraud involved, asserting that releasing the petitioner on bail at this crucial stage may hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially lead to tampering with evidence or influencing of witnesses. Accordingly, a dismissal of the instant petition in order to facilitate effective investigation into the alleged offence. I have heard the learned counsel for the rival parties and have gone through the available record of the case. put forth in the FIR in question, indubitably, serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. The FIR ibid was lodged on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant namely cyber financial fraud. Prima facie, it emerges , in connivance with co-accused, is alleged is entreated for opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner by arguing that the offence committed by a substantial portion of has been o Union Bank Account No. 207722010001791, which stands in the further contended that in light of these incriminating financial trails and the seriousness of the allegations, the is imperative for a fair and thorough interrogation is essential to conspirators, and recover the ity of the on bail at this crucial stage may hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially Accordingly, a order to and have put forth in the FIR in question, indubitably, ibid was lodged on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant namely emerges accused, is alleged AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- to have been involved in the commission of cyber financial fraud against the complainant. facilitated the fraudulent activity by permitting the use of his bank account. Furthermore, during the course of investigation, transferred into Union Bank Account No.207722010001791, which is registered in the nam other circumstances detailed in the investigation, points towards complicity asserted that the custodial interrogation the purpose of effectively unravelling the modus operandi of the accused persons, identifying the broader nexus involved in the fraud, and recovering the siphoned amount. The nature and gravity of the offence, involving organized cybercrime and financial deceit, necessitate a thorough investigation, which, at this stage, cannot be conducted without the petitioner raised by the demonstrated which would warrant the grant of anticipatory bail in such a serious economic offence. 7. pleas, particularly in cases concerning cybercrimes and onl necessitates a meticulous evaluation of several pivotal factors. Paramount among these is the inherent gravity and seriousness of the offense, coupled with its potential societal ramifications. The proliferation of online frauds and cybercrimes confidence in digital financial transaction platforms. Such -22968-2025 to have been involved in the commission of cyber financial fraud against the complainant. As per the stand of the State facilitated the fraudulent activity by permitting the use of his bank account. Furthermore, during the course of investigation, transferred into Union Bank Account No.207722010001791, which is registered in the name of the petitioner other circumstances detailed in the investigation, points towards complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence. asserted that the custodial interrogation of the the purpose of effectively unravelling the modus operandi of the accused persons, identifying the broader nexus involved in the fraud, and recovering the siphoned amount. The nature and gravity of the offence, involving nized cybercrime and financial deceit, necessitate a thorough investigation, which, at this stage, cannot be conducted without the petitioner being in custody. Moreover, even considering the medical grounds raised by the petitioner, no exceptional or compe demonstrated which would warrant the grant of anticipatory bail in such a serious economic offence. It is befitting to mention here that while adjudicating the pleas, particularly in cases concerning cybercrimes and onl necessitates a meticulous evaluation of several pivotal factors. Paramount among these is the inherent gravity and seriousness of the offense, coupled with its potential societal ramifications. The proliferation of online frauds and cybercrimes poses a significant threat, as it systematically erodes public confidence in digital financial transaction platforms. Such 5 to have been involved in the commission of cyber financial fraud against the stand of the State, the petitioner appears to have facilitated the fraudulent activity by permitting the use of his bank account. Furthermore, during the course of investigation, a sum of ₹10,00,000/- was transferred into Union Bank Account No.207722010001791, which is petitioner-accused. This fact, coupled with other circumstances detailed in the investigation, points towards the active in the alleged offence. The police have further of the petitioner is indispensable for the purpose of effectively unravelling the modus operandi of the accused persons, identifying the broader nexus involved in the fraud, and recovering the siphoned amount. The nature and gravity of the offence, involving nized cybercrime and financial deceit, necessitate a thorough investigation, which, at this stage, cannot be conducted without the Moreover, even considering the medical grounds , no exceptional or compelling circumstance has been demonstrated which would warrant the grant of anticipatory bail in such a It is befitting to mention here that while adjudicating the bail pleas, particularly in cases concerning cybercrimes and online fraud, necessitates a meticulous evaluation of several pivotal factors. Paramount among these is the inherent gravity and seriousness of the offense, coupled with its potential societal ramifications. The proliferation of online frauds poses a significant threat, as it systematically erodes public confidence in digital financial transaction platforms. Such erosion runs to have been involved in the commission of cyber financial fraud against the appears to have facilitated the fraudulent activity by permitting the use of his bank account. was transferred into Union Bank Account No.207722010001791, which is accused. This fact, coupled with the active The police have further is indispensable for the purpose of effectively unravelling the modus operandi of the accused persons, identifying the broader nexus involved in the fraud, and recovering the siphoned amount. The nature and gravity of the offence, involving nized cybercrime and financial deceit, necessitate a thorough investigation, which, at this stage, cannot be conducted without the Moreover, even considering the medical grounds lling circumstance has been demonstrated which would warrant the grant of anticipatory bail in such a bail ine fraud, necessitates a meticulous evaluation of several pivotal factors. Paramount among these is the inherent gravity and seriousness of the offense, coupled with its potential societal ramifications. The proliferation of online frauds poses a significant threat, as it systematically erodes public runs AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- counter to the aspirations of an advanced and digitally empowered "Digital Bharat" and thus warrants a heightened degree These offenses are characterized by their capacity to aggrieve a multitude of victims simultaneously, often with a single act of commission. The deleterious consequences of cybercrimes transcend individual boundaries, imperiling numerous unsuspecting citizens. The gravity of such transgressions cannot, therefore, be understated. They not only jeopardize the financial security and trust reposed by individuals in financial payment gateways and platforms but also inherently expose analogous threats. Indeed, cybercrime in our nation operates akin to a silent virus — insidious, disruptive, and exacting a toll on society that extends far beyond mere pecuniary loss, encompassing the bedrock of trust, security, and national progress. Given the inherent nature and profound gravity of such offenses, and their wide financial institutions, this Court finds itself disinclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail as praye eye to the profound and far depredations. facie case is not made out against the petitioner. come on record and preliminary investigation, appear to be established a reasonable basis for the accusations. Thus, it is not appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, as it would necessarily cause impediment in effective investigation. 8. petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail in the factual -22968-2025 counter to the aspirations of an advanced and digitally empowered "Digital Bharat" and thus warrants a heightened degree These offenses are characterized by their capacity to aggrieve a multitude of victims simultaneously, often with a single act of commission. The deleterious consequences of cybercrimes transcend individual boundaries, g numerous unsuspecting citizens. The gravity of such transgressions cannot, therefore, be understated. They not only jeopardize the financial security and trust reposed by individuals in financial payment gateways and platforms but also inherently expose analogous threats. Indeed, cybercrime in our nation operates akin to a silent insidious, disruptive, and exacting a toll on society that extends far beyond mere pecuniary loss, encompassing the bedrock of trust, security, d national progress. Given the inherent nature and profound gravity of such offenses, and their wide-ranging cascading effects on both society and financial institutions, this Court finds itself disinclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail as prayed for. To do otherwise would be to turn a to the profound and far-reaching detrimental impact of these digital depredations. At this stage, there is no material on record to hold that case is not made out against the petitioner. come on record and preliminary investigation, appear to be established a reasonable basis for the accusations. Thus, it is not appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, as it would necessarily cause impediment ive investigation. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail in the factual 6 counter to the aspirations of an advanced and digitally empowered "Digital Bharat" and thus warrants a heightened degree of judicial circumspection. These offenses are characterized by their capacity to aggrieve a multitude of victims simultaneously, often with a single act of commission. The deleterious consequences of cybercrimes transcend individual boundaries, g numerous unsuspecting citizens. The gravity of such transgressions cannot, therefore, be understated. They not only jeopardize the financial security and trust reposed by individuals in financial payment gateways and platforms but also inherently expose the broader populace to analogous threats. Indeed, cybercrime in our nation operates akin to a silent insidious, disruptive, and exacting a toll on society that extends far beyond mere pecuniary loss, encompassing the bedrock of trust, security, d national progress. Given the inherent nature and profound gravity of ranging cascading effects on both society and financial institutions, this Court finds itself disinclined to grant the relief of d for. To do otherwise would be to turn a Nelson’s reaching detrimental impact of these digital At this stage, there is no material on record to hold that prima case is not made out against the petitioner. The material which has come on record and preliminary investigation, appear to be established a reasonable basis for the accusations. Thus, it is not appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, as it would necessarily cause impediment Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail in the factual counter to the aspirations of an advanced and digitally empowered "Digital of judicial circumspection. These offenses are characterized by their capacity to aggrieve a multitude of victims simultaneously, often with a single act of commission. The deleterious consequences of cybercrimes transcend individual boundaries, g numerous unsuspecting citizens. The gravity of such transgressions cannot, therefore, be understated. They not only jeopardize the financial security and trust reposed by individuals in financial payment the broader populace to analogous threats. Indeed, cybercrime in our nation operates akin to a silent insidious, disruptive, and exacting a toll on society that extends far beyond mere pecuniary loss, encompassing the bedrock of trust, security, d national progress. Given the inherent nature and profound gravity of ranging cascading effects on both society and financial institutions, this Court finds itself disinclined to grant the relief of Nelson’s reaching detrimental impact of these digital prima e material which has come on record and preliminary investigation, appear to be established a reasonable basis for the accusations. Thus, it is not appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, as it would necessarily cause impediment Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail in the factual AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- matrix of the case in hand. Moreover, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessa The petition is, thus, devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed. 9. of opinion upon merits of the case/investigation. 10. July 03, 202 Ajay -22968-2025 matrix of the case in hand. Moreover, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary for an effective investigation & to unravel the truth. The petition is, thus, devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed. Nothing said hereinabove shall be deemed to be an expression of opinion upon merits of the case/investigation. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 7 matrix of the case in hand. Moreover, custodial interrogation of the ry for an effective investigation & to unravel the truth. The petition is, thus, devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed. Nothing said hereinabove shall be deemed to be an expression of opinion upon merits of the case/investigation. lication(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No matrix of the case in hand. Moreover, custodial interrogation of the ry for an effective investigation & to unravel the truth. Nothing said hereinabove shall be deemed to be an expression AJAY KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document