Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5158 (AP)

SARAGADAM BHOOLOKAMMA v. KONATALA VENKATA SATYA LAXMI MADHURI

CRP/308/2020 · 2025-08-28

V Sujatha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010042392020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 308/2020 Between: 1. SARAGADAM BHOOLOKAMMA, W/O LATE VEERUNAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT ---YEARS, HINDU, HOLD DUTIES, R/O VADLAPUDI, RH COLONY, D.NO. 28-22-14, GAGUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM-46. 2. SRI. SARAGADAM SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O LATE VEERUNAIDU, HINDU, R/O. D.NO. 31-35-6, VIVEKANANDA COLONY, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SMT. RAPETI ADILAXMI, W/O RAMA RAO, HINDU, EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO. 31-4-28, AMMAVARI VEEDI, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. KONATALA VENKATA SATYA LAXMI MADHURI, W/o Subrahmanya Jagannadha Rao, Hindu, aged about 44 years, R/o Plot No. 911, 05/301, Jurang West, Street No. 91, Singapore-64091. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records and set aside the E.P.. order dated 22.02.2019 passed In E.P. 109 of 2018 in O.S. 191 of 2007 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge,' Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay 226 days in representing the CRP. IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To dispense with Photostat copy of the certified copy of EP. No. 109/2018 in O.S. No. 191/2007 and to prepare such order and further orders as this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the interest or justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in EP. No.109/2018 in O>S. No. 191/2007 by the learned Principle Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam proceedings till the disposal of the case and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing, Sri N.Ravi Prasad as well as Sri Karukola Simhachalam, learned counsels for the petitioners brought to the notice of this Court that the E.P.No.109 of 2018 in O.S.No.191 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam, which is under challenge before this Court, was already closed on 06.12.2019. Hence, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:29.08.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 308/2020 Date:29.08.2025 KA