PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/4363/2025 · 2025-04-30
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51577 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51577 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr.
for the petitioner
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
1.
The present writ petition has been filed Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 11 i.e. private respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners are major and want to marry with each other. Both of them are residing together, acceptable to respondent Nos.4 to 11 with dire consequences. liberty from respondent representation dated action has been taken so far.
3.
Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4.
Mr. Ram Court, accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER
V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Sandeep K. Ghillour, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 11 i.e. private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioners are major and want to marry with each other. Both of them are residing together, in live-in relationship but the said relationship is not respondent Nos.4 to 11 and they are threatening to petiti with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to their l liberty from respondent Nos.4 to 11 and in this regard, submitted a representation dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-3 action has been taken so far. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4363-2025 Date of decision: 30.04.2025
...PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major and want to marry with each other. Both of them are in relationship but the said relationship is not and they are threatening to petitioners The petitioners apprehend danger to their life and and in this regard, submitted a 3) to respondent No.2 but no Notice of motion to official respondents only. esh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana, who is present in accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners
MANISHA 2025.04.30 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment
CRWP-4363-2025
is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the couns for the State during the course of the day.
5.
Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with dire to decide the repr of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance w
6.
It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
April 30, 2025 manisha
(i)
(ii) 2025 2 is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the couns for the State during the course of the day. Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with dire to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance w It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 esentation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
MANISHA 2025.04.30 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment