Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51564 (AP)

K. Ramadas Nalk, v. Dr. Rajat Bhargava

CC/890/2020 · 2025-11-06

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010249602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 890 OF 2020 Between: 1. K. Ramadas Nalk,, s/o late Srl K.Hanuma Nalk, aged 63 years, Retired Proh and Excise Inspector, Voyalapadu, Chittoor District, r/o Plot No.25, NSR Nllayam, Huda Plots, RC Road, Royal Nagar, Near Lavanya Appts.,Tirupatl. Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Dr Rajat Bhargava, , IAS, Special Chief Secretary Revenue (Excise) 4th Block, Ground Floor, Room No. 134, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Vivek Yadav, , S/o Motilal, The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, State of Andhra Pradesh Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents in not implementing the orders passed in W.P.No.16234 of 2019 dated 5-11-2019 of Her Lorship Hon'ble Justice Smt. KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Respondents: N ASWARTHA NARAYANA SRK, J CC No.890 of 2020 2 The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed seeking to punish the respondents for not implementing the orders of this Court passed in WP No.16234 of 2019, dated 05.11.2019. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, and hence, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:07.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J CC No.890 of 2020 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No.890 of 2020 Date:07.11.2025 Nsr