APHC010641172016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34664/2016 Between: 1. P.SUNIL, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC: MANDAL COORDINATOR, KALUVAI, R/O. KALUVAI, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION NELLORE NELLORE DIST, - 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE, - 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering petitioners case on the pretext that the service Rules would not permit even though the petitioner is qualified to seek the appointment as Supervisor having been completed M.A.B.Ed through the 2 impugned order dated 25.6.2016 as being illegal, arbitrary and is inviolation of principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently set aside the same with a direction to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Supervisor by giving preference to his previous experience from the post of Mandal !Coordinator of the Adult Education Department, to and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 42742 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Supervisor in the 2nd respondent Departmet considering his past service put on temporary basis as Mandal Coordinator, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition writ petition No. 34664 of 2016 in above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34664 of 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of respondents in not considering the case of petitioner on the pretext that the service Rules would not permit even though the petitioner is qualified to seek the appointment as Supervisor having been completed M.A. B.Ed through the impugned order dated 25.06.2016 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Sri M.Chalapathi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date: 24.11.2025 sj 4 107 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.34664 of 2016 Date: 24.11.2025 sj