1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3089 of 2025 1 - Smt. Dhaneshwari Verma W/o Narendra Verma Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Badgaon, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Dev Charan Verma S/o Narendra Verma Aged About 8 Years Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Dhaneshwari Verma, R/o Village Badgaon, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - Devanshi Verma D/o Narendra Verma Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Dhaneshwari Verma, R/o Village Badgaon, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur, C.G. 4 - Himanshi Verma D/o Narendra Verma Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Dhaneshwari Verma, R/o Village Badgaon, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Narendra Verma S/o Santram Verma Aged About 46 Years R/o Ameri, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on board 10.10.2025 1. Heard 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for direction to the learned SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.10.10 18:06:00 +0530 2 First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, to decide the maintenance application pending before in the case of MCC 155/2025 as early as possible and also the expedite disposal of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed an application for grant of maintenance on 25.01.2025 along with the application for grant of interim maintenance, however, till date the application for grant of interim maintenance has not been decided and the proceeding of the case is adjourned for one and other reason, therefore, a direction to be made to the learned Family Court to decide the case as early as possible. 4. From perusal of the order-sheets annexed with the petition, it transpires that there are certain adjournment taken by the respondent for filing of the reply and thereafter, he proceeded ex-parte and ultimately, he made an application under order 9 Rule 7 of CPC for setting aside the ex-party order. The apprehension of the petitioner that the trial of the case will take its own time, a case to be genine and in view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that a direction can be made to decide the application of the petitioners as early as possible. 5. Therefore, the learned First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur is directed to expedite the trial of the case and to decide the case as early as possible preferably with 07 months from the next date of hearing. 6. The petitioner will produce a copy of this order to the learned First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the present Cr.MP is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sagrika