1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12000 of 2025 1. Awdhesh Tiwari S/o Late Veanti Prasad Tiwari Aged About 63 Years R/o Semrakhurd Po- Kewra, District- Surajpur, C.G. 497223 2. Laxmi Prasad S/o Chamaarsay Kewat Aged About 63 Years R/o Farhada, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur C.G.495550 3. Padma Bai Vaishnav W/o Late Nempal Das Aged About 63 Years R/o Quarter No,a1/24-B, Irrigation Colony Darri Jamnipali, District- Korba, C.G. 495450 4. Tripathi Ram S/o Kendu Ram Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No 12, Village- Beldagi Post- Lakhanpur Thana- Lakhanpur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 49711 5. Rambai Maravi W/o Parasram Maravi Aged About 71 Years R/o 34/5, Namna, District- Surajpur C.G. 497333. 6. Parasram Maravi S/o Charku Maravi Aged About 71 Years R/o 85, Harrapara, Namna Kalan, District- Surajpur, C.G. 497116 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, General Administration Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur Tehsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492002 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resource Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Tehsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492002 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Finance Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Tehsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh.492002 4. Joint Director Pension And Account Treasury Department Bilaspur Division District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 5. Engineer In Chief Water Resource Department Sihawa Bhawan, New Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6. Executive Engineer E And M, Minimata Bango Division Machadoli, Head Quarter- Katghora District- Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State : Mr. S. Sahu, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 15/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.10.16 11:26:47 +0530