Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51560 (AP)

V.Himavantha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/44435/2018 · 2025-12-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010920322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 44435/2018 Between: 1. V.HIMAVANTHA RAO, S/O RAGHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50- YEARS,OCC, AGRICULTURE GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE NADENDLA MANDALAM GUNTUR, DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHILAKALURIPETA, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NADENDLA POLICE STATION GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action on the part of 2 to 5 respondents in not registered the crime on the basis of the report dated 11/10/2018 and representations dt, 13/10/2018 and 05.11.2018 for taking action against the persons who have committed the offence of cognizable i.e trespass, threatening to kill the employees of Lift Irrigation Scheme and attempt murder to the petitioner etc. is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and issue consequential direction to the Respondents to register 2 the crime and take action against the accused in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent. No. 5 to register the crime basing on Petitioner complaint/report dt, 11.10.2018 and investigate the case in accordance with law, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y ANANTHA RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.44435 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 9th December, 2025 cbn 4 45 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.44435 of 2018 9th December, 2025 cbn