Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5156 (MAD)

Vijayakumar.S v. The District Collector

CMP(MD)/15839/2025 · 2026-03-04

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR. No. 79725 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD)SR.No. 79725 of 2025 S.Vijayakumar. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of Shipping Rural Transport Highway, G5 and 6, Section - 19, Dwarka, New Delhi. 3. The Planning / Project Director, Land Acquisition National Highway Authority of India, Near Ayyapan Temple, Parvathypuram, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition National Highway, Tirunelveli District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR. No. 79725 of 2025 5. The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition National Highway, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 6. Special Thasildhar, National Highway Land Acquisition, Mathar Sangam Road, Ramanputhoor, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the present writ appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Fazil M/s.Roy and Roy Associates For R1, 4, 5 & 6 : Mr. S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.Su.Srinivasan ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the above writ appeal. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR. No. 79725 of 2025 2. Mr. S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1, 4, 5 and 6 and Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned counsel, accepts notice for the respondents 2 and 3 and they have no serious objection in allowing this petition. 3. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application and considering the nature of issue involved in this case and also considering the fact that the respondents have not raised serious objection, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Hence, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. 4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the appeal for admission in the usual course. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 04.03.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes apd 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR. No. 79725 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. apd C.M.P.(MD)No.15839 of 2025 in W.A.(MD)SR.No.79725 of 2025 04.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis