126 LAKHPATI AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. the petitioner No.1and father of respondent Nos.2 to 4 and son of petitioner No.5 namely Mohit Kumar unfortunately died due to callous attitude of the respondent the petitioners are entitled for judgement of the Co 2017 titled “ 2. have alrea 20.12.2024 (Annexure P the respondents and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-12088 Date of Decision : 07 LAKHPATI AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sunil Goswami, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of e petitioner No.1and father of respondent Nos.2 to 4 and son of petitioner No.5 namely Mohit Kumar unfortunately died due to callous attitude of the respondent-authorities including the Municipal Committee concerned hence, the petitioners are entitled for the compensation keeping in view the judgement of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.11525 of 2017 titled “Mamta Vs. Union of India and ors.”, decided on 16.02.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the demand noticed dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 12088-2025 Date of Decision : 07-05-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of e petitioner No.1and father of respondent Nos.2 to 4 and son of petitioner No.5 namely Mohit Kumar unfortunately died due to callous attitude of the authorities including the Municipal Committee concerned hence, the compensation keeping in view the ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.11525 of Mamta Vs. Union of India and ors.”, decided on 16.02.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners dy raised the said grievance in the demand noticed dated 7) but the same is still pending consideration with the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of e petitioner No.1and father of respondent Nos.2 to 4 and son of petitioner No.5 namely Mohit Kumar unfortunately died due to callous attitude of the authorities including the Municipal Committee concerned hence, the compensation keeping in view the ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.11525 of Mamta Vs. Union of India and ors.”, decided on 16.02.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners dy raised the said grievance in the demand noticed dated 7) but the same is still pending consideration with the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.08 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12088-2025 -2- direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State and submits that in case, the demand notice dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 5. Ordered accordingly. 07-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.08 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document