Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000252025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.M.Appln./2/2024 Shri Bing Bagang Age: 54 Occupation : Address:S/o Late Jeli Bagang r/o Rakap Colony A Sector Industrial Area Naharlagun P.O/P.S Naharlagun District Papum pare Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Others Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented through the public prosecutor. 2:Shri Gaurav Gogoi Age: 24 Occupation : Address:permanent resident of village 1 No. Balupara P.O Borguri P.S Guijan District Tinsukia Assam 786126 3:Shri Dicky Kumar Das Age: 24 Occupation : Address:S/o Shri Bipul Das permanent resident of village Kokoratoli Page No.# 2/3 P.O Borguri P.S Guijan District Tinsukia Assam 786126 4:Shri Kaushik Chetry Age: 22 Occupation : Address:S/o Late Krishna Bahadur Chetry permanent resident of village Boiragimoth P.O Dibrugarh P.S Gabrupathar District Dibrugarh Assam 786001 5:Shri Kapa Rai Age: 46 Occupation : Address:S/o Late Krishna Bahadur Chetry permanent resident of Charu P.O Nacho District Upper Subansiri Arunachal Pradesh 791122 Advocate for the Petitioner : Khoda Tama, Tasso Dodung,Khoda Yubey,Jambey Tsering,R Barman,Sumit Chhetri,T Lampung Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, T Loma,Dindo Boni,Teshi Aaku,N Kanu,T Rahul,N Kuma,P Tatam,N Rama BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 22.09.2025 Heard Mr. J. Tsering, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. O. Modi, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and M. N. Danggen, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 and Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel for respondent No. 5, while placing the order dated 04.07.2025, passed by the Session Judge, Yupia, submits that in the Page No.# 3/3 instant case, the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 were never been charge-sheeted, and respondent No. 5, namely, Shri Kapa Rai, has been discharged by the Sessions Court, Yupia. In view of the above, she submits that the matter has become infructuous and therefore, prays for closing the petition. The order dated 04.07.2025, is taken on record and marked as document ‘X’ for identification. The learned counsel for the petition has no objection. I have perused the order and the order does not reflect the names of respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, as they were not charge-sheeted and the respondent No. 5, namely, Shri Kapa Rai has been discharged as no offence was made against him. In view of the above, this Crl.M.Appln. No. 02(AP)/2025 stands dismissed on becoming infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant