Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51549 (PAT)

Hareram Mahto @ Hareram Bind v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38381/2025 · 2025-08-29

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38381 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2016 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Hareram Mahto @ Hareram Bind S/O Mukhlal Mahato Resident of Village -Asoiyan ,Police station- Marhowrah, District- saran chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bashishtha Narayan Mishra, Advocate Mr. Avinash Raj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 29-08-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with S.Tr. No. 447 of 2025 arising out of Sonepur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2016 for the offence punishable under sections 396, 397 of the IPC lodged on 22.09.2023 by the informant, Muskan Praveen. 3. As per the prosecution story, the allegation against the accused persons is/are of killing two persons while committing 'dacoity'. During investigation, the arrested persons Gabbar Nat and Fulteni Nat named this petitioner to be an accomplish. Accordingly, the FIR. 4. In this case, earlier, Trial Court report was called for which is on record. According to it, the charges have already been framed. 5. Considering the allegation that has come and it is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38381 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 case of double muder while committing dacoity a decade ago, the role of the petitioner has come up, in that background, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail. 6. However, the petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2023, it is important that the trial expedited and taken to its logical conclusion. 7. Accordingly, the Court directs the Trial Court to see to it that without unnecessary delay, the trial is taken to its logical conclusion. priyanka/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T