Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51544 (CHH)

V.G. PILLAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8463/2023 · 2025-10-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49908 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8463 of 2023 1 - V.G. Pillai S/o Vasu Devan Nair Aged About 63 Years R/o Forest Colony, Bangla Para, Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest And Climate Change Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest And Head Of Forest Force Sector 19, Kotara Bhantha, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Kanker Circle, Kanker (C.G.). 4 - Divisional Forest Officer Narayanpur, District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Order on Board 07/10/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/direction/order quashing the letter dated 15.09.2023(Annexure P-1) and direct the Respondent Authorities to release the retiral dues of the Petitioner; and/or 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat