1 2025:CGHC:49694 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5457 of 2023 1 - Smt. Beena Chouhan S/o Late Shri Meshram Chouhan Aged About 32 Years R/o- House No. 50, Darimaroad Gram Kareyon Darima Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, Aabkari / Vanijya Kar Vibhag, Mantralaya, Nayaraipur, C.G. 2 - Sachiv Vitt Vibhag C.G. Shasan Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Aayukta Karyalaya Aabkari Aayukta Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sanyukta Sanchalak Sanchalnalay Kosh Lekha Avam Pension Chhattisgarh Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Jila Aabkari Adhikari Karyalay Jila Aabkari Adhikari Surguja, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Jila Aabkari Adhikari Karyalaya Jila Aabkari Adhikari Koriya, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 2 7 - Jila Aabkari Adhikari Karyalaya Jila Aabkari Adhikari Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Sanyukta Sanchalak Kosh Lekha Avam Pension Sambhagiya Karyalaya Surguja, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06.10.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s) :- “10.1. यह कि उत्तरवा दीगण किदीकित किय जा वा कि वा य कि त मृत पकित मृसर मृ ह आब र आरक्ष सवा स!धा रण प्रथमृ किय%कि& किदी' स र तदी%स र उप दी , अवा गदीरण, प) वा अन्य मृदी+ मृ) किमृल वा ल परिरलब्धि/धाय+ प%रकिधा 0रण र) तथ अ!तर/एरिरयस0 र कि वा अन्य ल भ दी स!ब!धा मृ) घ्र य0वा ह र)। 10.2 यह कि उत्तरवा दीगण किदीकित किय जा वा कि वा य कि मृत पकित आब र आरक्ष प), उप दी , अवा गदीरण एवा! अन्य परिरलब्धि/धाय+ ल भ प्रथमृ किय%कि& कितथ स र समृस्त अ!तर / एरिरयस0 र कि भ%गत र य0वा ह र)। 10.3 यह कि, अन्य अ%तष जा मृ य न्य य लय उकित समृझे उत्तरवा दीगण स य कि त किदील य जा वा)।" 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the identical issue has been raised before this Court and has already been decided by the Hon’ble Division Bench as well as by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Accordingly, he prays that this petition may be 3 disposed of in light of the orders passed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 88 of 2019 and the Co-ordinate Bench in Writ Petition (S) No. 5604 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel does not oppose the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the decisions rendered by the Hon’ble Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 88 of 2018 and the Co-ordinate Bench in Writ Petition (S) No. 5604 of 2023, this petition is allowed in terms of the said orders. It is hereby ordered that the period of service rendered by the petitioner as a daily wages employee prior to regularization shall be counted for the purpose of calculating retiral dues, including pensionary benefits. It is, however, made clear that such implementation shall be subject to due verification of the petitioner’s service records. 5. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena