IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16588 OF 2005 Between: Smt. A. Nukanjali Devi, w/o. Sri A. Ravi Babu, aged 25 years, Occ: Record Assistant, AJ. Khalasala, R/o Machilipatnam, Krishna District C 1/142-D16, Sivaganga, Kalekhanpeta ...PETITIONER AND 1. Commissioner & Director of Collegiate Hyderabad. , . 2. Correspondent, Andhra .Jateeya Kalasala, Machilipatnam District-521 001. Education, Nampally, Krishna ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the first respondent to regularize the service of petitioner in the post of Attender in the second respondent college the recommendation sent by second respondent dt. 11.05.2005. LA. NO: 1 OF 2005rWPMP. NO: 21088 OF 2nnfi) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing as per the second respondent to continue the petitioner in service in the second respondent college, pending disposal of the above W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent l^o!2fSM^^ M VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: OF^biR V^' N 3. ; APHC010279312005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16588/2005 Between: Smt. A. Nukanjali Devi, Krishna District. ...PETITIONER AND Commissioner Director Of Collegiate Fducation And Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VSESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR EDUCATION 2.M VIDYAVATHI The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today 2. there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. -m 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for shall be no order as to costs. non-prosecution. There As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH :rar SECTION OFFICER ASSISTANT R //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Smt. V Sesha Kumari Advocate 2. One CC to Smt. M Vidyavathi Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Education, High Court of Andhra 4. Three CD Copies TF (gsg) [OPUC] Pradesh. [OUT] T HIGH COURT \ \ DATED.01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.16588 of 2005 i/O 13 OCT 2025 SI CO/i Current sieenon ★ SSrS,™!" '’- "“"■'’'’OSECUT.ON,