HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD & SRI. B.S. PRASAD, MEMBER W.P. No.7040/2022 (Lok Adalat No.3998/2025) C/W W.P. No.12195/2023 (Lok Adalat No.3999/2025) IN W.P. No.7040/2022: BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRNSPORT CORPORATION (KSRTC) KOLAR DIVISION KOLAR DISTRICT HEREIN REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER KSRTC CENTRAL OFFICES K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE) 2 AND: SRI. B. RAJ KISHORE S/O SRI. H.S. BABU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO.200, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN AMARAVATHI NAGAR BANGARPET KOLAR-560 020. &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24.12.2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND LABOUR COURT, KOLAR IN ID NO.26/2018 ON DOMESTIC ENQUIRY VIDE ANNX-D AND TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED 09.12.2021 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND LABOUR COURT, KOLAR IN ID NO.26/2018 VIDE ANNX-E. IN W.P. No.12195/2023: BETWEEN: 1 . B. RAJ KISHORE S/O H.S. BABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO 200, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, AMARAVATHI NAGAR, BENGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT-563114 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) 3 AND: 1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, KOLAR DIVISION, KOLAR-563114 &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 09.12.2021 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR IN ID NO.26/2018 VIDE ANNX-A TO THE WP IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO DENIAL OF 50 PERCENT BACK WAGES AND ORDERED FOR DE NOVO ENQUIRY BY REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY ARE CONCERNED. THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCIALIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER In these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the Award dated 09.12.2021 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Labour Court, 4 Kolar in I.D. No.26/2018 [Annexure -E & A in the respective petitions]. 2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows: 1. The Petitioner 3 Corporation agreed to reinstate the petitioner 3 workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits and without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. 2. The Respondent is not entitled for wages from the date of award till the date of interim order and he is also not entitled for difference of wages from the date of interim order till the date of settlement. 3. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 5 09.12.2021 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Labour Court, Kolar in I.D. No.26/2018 [Annexure -E & A in the respective petitions]. . Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER NV 6 FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP.NO.7040/2022 (LOK ADALAT NO. 3998/2025) c/w WP.NO.12195/2023 (LOK ADALAT NO. 3999/2025) BETWEEN DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC &Petitioner AND: SRI. B RAJ KISHORE &Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in ID.No.26/2018 dated 9.12.2021 on the file of the Principal District & Session Judge, Kolar has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: 1. The Petitioner 3 Corporation agreed to reinstate the petitioner 3 workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits and without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. 2. The Respondent is not entitled for wages from the date of award till the date of interim order and he is also not entitled for difference of wages from the date of interim order till the date of settlement. 3. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 26.04.2025 at Bengaluru Bench. Sd/- Sd/- SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT Sd/- Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/S