Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51531 (ALL)

MUNNA LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/1242/2025 · 2025-05-13

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86331 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1242 of 2025 Applicant :- Munna Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Dohare Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.1850 of 2022 (State Vs. Veerendra Kumar and others) arising out of case crime no.236 of 2021, under Sections 323, 325, 504 IPC, Police Station Utraon, District Prayagraj pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.8, Allahabad, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the informant of this case. The case is lingering on on account of non- appearance of opposite parties no.2 to 4. It is also submitted that now the accused persons / opposite parties no.2 to 4 have appeared before the Court and they have been granted bail but no charges have been framed so far by the trial court. The case pertains to the year 2022. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to pass an order on the point of framing of the charge in this case as per law within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and if the charges are framed, all endeavours shall be made by it for the expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case, keeping in view the work load in the said Court, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad