Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51525 (AP)

K.Sita Lakshmi v. Union of India

WP/45028/2018 · 2025-12-21

Sumathi Jagadam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010932122018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45028/2018 Between: 1. K.SITA LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE ARUN KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS. PROP. GOWTHAMI GAS AGENCY, 13-15-29, ARYAPURAM TIMBER DEPOT YARD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, NEW DELHI. 2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LPG-S) INDANE AREA OFFICE, 8TH FLOOR, L.I.C.BUILDING, JEEVITHA BHIMA MARG, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE CHIEF AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, 8TH FLOOR, L.I.C.BUILDING, JEEVITHA BHIMA MARG, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. MADIREDDY VIJAYA CHANDRA KALYANI, W/O.PRATAP, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.S.V.SQUARE, 1ST FLOOR, PLOT NO.796-B, ROAD NO.36, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 2 JS,J W.P.No.45028/2018 in threatening to cancel the Petitioners LPG distributorship of Indane Gas Agency, at the instance of the Respondent No.4 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to take any coercive steps to cancel the Petitioner's LPG distributorship of Indane Gas Agency, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 2. B JITHENDER (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) 3 JS,J W.P.No.45028/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.45028/2018 146 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45028/2018 Dated: 22.12.2025 KAS