Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85632-DB Court No. - 46 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8576 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vaibhav Joon Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sunil Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Hon'ble Harvir Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This criminal misc. writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned F.I.R dated 5.9.2023, arising out of Case Crime no. 383 of 2023, under sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Mawana, District-Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Respondent No. 3 is the brother in-law of petitioner and on account of earlier dispute between the parties, the impugned first information report was lodged by the respondent no. 3, however subsequently, with the intervention of respected members of the society, parties have amicably and genuinely settled all their disputes and differences and now they do not have any grievance against each other. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has next drawn the attention of the Court to a settlement-agreement dated 4.4.2025 drawn between the parties, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to this petition. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has next submitted that in view of the compromise made between the parties and in order to maintain cordial and harmonious relations between them, the impugned first information report qua the petitioner be quashed. 6. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3 has appeared and has also filed an affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 3 and in paragraph-4, the said settlement-agreement has been acknowledged. He has further submitted that the said compromise has been arrived at without any coercion and undue influence. In paragraph- 8 of the counter affidavit, it has been further stated that in view of the compromise between the parties, Respondent No. 3 has no objection, if the impugned first information report is quashed qua the petitioner. 7. It is further submitted that a compromise made between the parties has already been verified by the concerned Magistrate, Mawana Meerut and a report dated 12.5.2025 has been forwarded to this Court, a copy of which has been annexed with the writ petition and shall form part of this writ petition. 8. This Court is not unmindful of the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court passed in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir Vs. State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by Hon'bel Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 10. Accordingly, the impugned F.I.R. dated 5.9.2023, arising out of Case Crime no. 383 of 2023, under sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Mawana, District-Meerut qua the petitioner is quashed. 11. This writ petition is accordingly allowed qua the petitioner. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 KU Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad