Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51522 (AP)

INTI SUBBA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25766/2023 · 2025-11-20

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010499162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25766/2023 Between: 1. INTI SUBBA RAO, S/O. LATE GANGARAJU @ PEDA GANGARAJU, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. D. NO. 3-53, NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE, YADAVOLU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. (FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOVVURU REVENUE DIVISION, EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, ANANTHAPALLI, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. INTI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, YADAVOLU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. CHILAKA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED48 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, YADAVOLU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents more particularly 4th respondent in illegally and irregularly mutating the petitioner's agricultural land in an extent of Ac.1.10 Cents in Survey No.653-1C in favour of 6th respondent and an extent of Ac.0.57 Cents in Survey No.653-1C in favour of 7th respondent by illegally making Sub-Division Survey No. 653-1 as New Survey No.653-1C, situated in Yedavolu Village of Devarapalli Mandal of East Godavari District (formerly West Godavari District), without issuing prior notice to the petitioner, inviting his objections and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in violation of principles of natural justice and in contravention to law laid down by Full Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Chinnam Pandurangam Vs. Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and Others reported in 2007 (6) ALD 348 (FB), as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative ofthe provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to restore his name in record of rights connected to said lands, without allowing registration of any documents of conveyance if executed and presented by respondents 6 and 7 for alienation before the office of 5th respondent and pass s IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of mutation entries recorded in respect of agricultural land in an extent of Ac.1.10 Cents in Survey No.653-1C in favour of 6th respondent and an extent of Ac.0.57 Cents in Survey No.653-1C in favour of 7th respondent out of the petitioner's total extent of Ac.3.24 Cents in Survey No.653-1 situated in Yedavolu Village of Devarapalli Mandal of East Godavari District (formerly West Godavari District), without allowing registration of any document of conveyance if executed and presented by respondents 6 and 7 for alienation of said lands before the office of 5th respondent, Pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioner herein/Respondent No.5 in the Writ Petition No. 25766 of 2023 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SARATH KUMAR D Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25766 OF 2023 ORDER: Sri Shaik Jahangeer Basha, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 21.11.2025 KBN 05 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25766 of 2023 Date: 21.11.2025 KBN