APHC010499612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26178 OF 2025 Between: 1. GUTLA BODI DORA, S/o. Late Somulu, Aged about 66 years, Cultivation, R/o. TiruvadaVillage, V.Madugula Mandal Anakapalli District, A.P. 2. Gutia Sai Kiran, S/o. Bodi Dora, Aged about 22 years. Student, Tiruvada Village, V.Madugula Mandal Anakapalli District, A.P. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. The Superintendent of Police, Anakap A.P. 2. The Circle Inspector of Police, K.Kotapadu Police Station, K.Kotapadu, Anakapalli District, A.P. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, V.Madugula Police Station, V.Madugula Village and Mandal, Anakapalli District, A. 4. VanthuYellayyamma, W/o. Kannayya Dora, Aged about 62 years. Cultivation, Tiruvada Village, A. Veeranarayanam Post, V.Madugula Mandal, Anakapalli District, A.P 5. AtiaMusalamma, W/o. Late Pydithalli, Aged about 70 years, Cultivation, R/o. Tiruvada Village, Veeranarayanam (Post) V.Madugula Mandal, Anakapalli District, A.P. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26178 OF 2025 1. GUTLA BODI DORA, S/o. Late Somulu, Aged about 66 years, Cultivation, R/o. TiruvadaVillage, V.Madugula Mandal Anakapalli District, A.P. 2. Gutia Sai Kiran, S/o. Bodi Dora, Aged about 22 years. Student, Tiruvada lage, V.Madugula Mandal Anakapalli District, A.P. ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalli, Anakapalli, District, 2. The Circle Inspector of Police, K.Kotapadu Police Station, K.Kotapadu, 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, V.Madugula Police Station, V.Madugula Village and Mandal, Anakapalli District, A. thuYellayyamma, W/o. Kannayya Dora, Aged about 62 years. Cultivation, Tiruvada Village, A. Veeranarayanam Post, V.Madugula Mandal, 5. AtiaMusalamma, W/o. Late Pydithalli, Aged about 70 years, Cultivation, , Veeranarayanam (Post) V.Madugula Mandal, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. GUTLA BODI DORA, S/o. Late Somulu, Aged about 66 years, Cultivation, 2. Gutia Sai Kiran, S/o. Bodi Dora, Aged about 22 years. Student, Tiruvada ...Petitioners 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur alli, Anakapalli, District, 2. The Circle Inspector of Police, K.Kotapadu Police Station, K.Kotapadu, 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, V.Madugula Police Station, V.Madugula thuYellayyamma, W/o. Kannayya Dora, Aged about 62 years. Cultivation, Tiruvada Village, A. Veeranarayanam Post, V.Madugula Mandal, 5. AtiaMusalamma, W/o. Late Pydithalli, Aged about 70 years, Cultivation, , Veeranarayanam (Post) V.Madugula Mandal, 6. UgginaAppa Rao, S/o Late Dali Babu, Aged about 50 years. Cultivation, Sambhuvanipalem Village, H/o. Simmudipallem, Raiwada Panchayat, Devarapalli Mandal, Ankapalli District, A.P. 7. UgginaAppalaKonda, D/o. Appa Rao, Aged about 48 years. Cultivation, Sambhuvanipalem Village, H/o. SimmudipalemRaiwada Panchayat, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District, A.P. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 4th respondent in interfering in Civil matters at the instance of respondents 5 to 8 in O.S.No.35/2024 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), V.Madugula, Anakapalli District as bad, illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct 4th respondent not to interfere in civil matters and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct 4th respondent not to interfere in matters in respect of in suit in O.S.No.35/2024 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), V.Madugula in respect of an extent of 0-60cents in Survey No.80-8, an extent of 0-30 cents and an extent of 0-30 cents in Survey Nos. 80-3 and 80-4 and extent of 0-30 cents in Survey No. 17-5 of Tiruvada Village, V.Madugula Mandal, Anakapalli District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26178 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 4th respondent in interfering in Civil matters at the instance of respondents 5 to 8 in O.S.No.35/2024 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), V.Madugula, Anakapalli District as bad, illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct 4th respondent not to interfere in civil matters and to pass...…” 2. Heard Sri K.Subrahmanyam, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in civil matters at the respondent Nos.5 to 8 in O.S.NO.35 of 2024 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), V.Madugula, Anakapalli District and calling the petitioners to the police station and threatening them to settle dispute between them and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not harassing the petitioners and the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being registration of any crime. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 615 WRIT PETITION NO: 26178 OF 2025 Date: 25.09.2025 KKV