IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 103 Reetwinder Singh and others Shri Kamal Kishore Yadav, Administrative Secretary, School Education, Department of School Education, Punjab and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP and others vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the responden (Annexure P authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority b COCP-2089-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2089 of 2025 Date of decision : Reetwinder Singh and others Versus Kamal Kishore Yadav, Administrative Secretary, School Education, Department of School Education, Punjab and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Sohi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-35161-2024 and others vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the respondent that “…in case the legal notice dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority by keeping in mind the judgment of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2089 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.07.2025 …..Petitioners Kamal Kishore Yadav, Administrative Secretary, School Education, Department of School Education, Punjab and others …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying (Annexure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate 2024 titled as “Paramveer Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the “…in case the legal notice dated 04.11.2024 8) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent y keeping in mind the judgment of Saurabh Sharma’s case VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.28 18.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (supra) within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, after the decision any relief is to be extended to petitioners, the same will be extended, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioners for their information and necessary action.” necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 27.5.2025 in the present petition. the learned counsel for t thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper passed in the July 28, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable COCP-2089-2025 (O & M) within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, after the decision any relief is to be extended to petitioners, the same will be extended, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioners for their information and necessary action.” Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order 27.5.2025 by the respondent-authority in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, after the decision any relief is to be extended to the petitioners, the same will be extended, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioners for their information and necessary action.” Learned counsel for the respondents-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order authority; thus, no cause survives Copy of the aforesaid order dated 27.5.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.28 18.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document