Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51495 (AP)

T. RAKESH v. R.P. SISODIA

CC/847/2025 · 2025-11-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010152222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 847/2025 Between: 1. T. RAKESH, S/O LATE BALA RAJU, AGED 27 YEARS, OCC SENIOR ASSISTANT (UNDER ORDER OF REVERSION), O/O SUB REGISTRAR GUDUR, R/O TADA KANDRIGA VILLAGE, TADA MANDAL, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. R P SISODIA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED NOT KNOWN, OCC PRI. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE (REGISTRATION AND STAMPS) AP SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. G SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOT KNOWN, OCC DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, GUNTUR. O/O ZILLA PARISHAD COMPOUND, NAGARAMPALEM, BESIDE ELECTRICAL FUSE CALL STATION, GUNTUR-2. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon, prosecute, and punish the Respondents under Sec 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Honble High Court passed in IA.No.1 of 2025 in WP.No.2714 of 2025, dt.19-02-2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 19.02.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.2714 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri G. Krishnakiritee, learned counsel representing Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 19.02.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.2714 of 2025 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 39 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.847 OF 2025 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN