APHC010041752022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 260/2022 Between: 1. NAVINENI BHASKAR RAO, S/O. PENCHALAIAH AGED 37 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. APPARAOPALEM VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI, I.A.S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF AP PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MR KONA SASIDHAR, I.A.S THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF AP NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. MR K V N CHAKRADHAR BABU, I.A.S THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT WING) SPSR NELLORE AT NELLORE 4. MR T SUBBA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DEPARTMENT NELLORE,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. MR N V SUBBA REDDY, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DEPARTMENT ATMAKUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 6. MR R TIRUMALAYYA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, ATMAKUR, ATMAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 7. MR V HAZARAT BABU, SECRETARY, APPARAOPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT APPARAOPALEM VILLAGE,ATMAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order dated 2.11.2021 passed in W.P. No. 25294 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 2. TENNETI PRABHU DASU 3. OMKAR D 4. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 260 OF 2022 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining wilful disobedience of the order, dated 02.11.2021 passed in W.P.No.25294 of 2021. 2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the order of this Court is complied with and the payments are made to the petitioner as directed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same. 4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in the Contempt Case. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 07.11.2025 TM