Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32298 WP No. 24741 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 24741 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
MANJAMMA D/O LATE BETTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT CHITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT - 573 201 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573201
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN SUB DIVISION, HASSAN-573201
3. THE TASILDHAR HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN-57320
4. LATHAMANI T W/O LATE MOHANDAS C B , AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32298 WP No. 24741 of 2025
5. NITHINDAS S/O LATE MOHANDAS C B, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
6. SHREYASDAS S/O LATE MOHANDAS C B , AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
7. BETTAIAH S/O THIMMAIAH @ SIDDALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
8. JAVARAIAH S/O LATE KOOGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
9. C T THIMMAIAH S/O THIRUMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
10. DYAVAMMA W/O LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
11. C J VENKATESH S/O LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
12. SHIVANNA S/O LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
13. RAVI S/O LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32298 WP No. 24741 of 2025
14. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 14 ARE R/AT CHIGALLI VILLAGE, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT - 571 201 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOA) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21-01-2025 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.P.NO.46/2023- 24 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents Nos.1 to 3. Notice to respondent Nos.4 to 14 are not necessary for the following reasons. 2.
Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that having regard to the amendment brought to Section 136(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, w.e.f., 10.01.2025, the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32298 WP No. 24741 of 2025
petitioner will have to approach the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal questioning the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act. 3. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 CT:SS