Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51484 (AP)

POREDDY NAGENDRA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6868/2023 · 2025-12-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010134292023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6868/2023 Between: 1. POREDDY NAGENDRA REDDY, S/O POREDDY KALADHAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RIO R/O 5/80, NAVALAKULA GARDENS, MEESEVA MYPADU ROAD, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE RURAL SUB DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NELLORE RURAL POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NELLORE RURAL POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide proceedings no C.No.112/GL- SDO.N(R)/2014 dated 06.06.2014 on the file of the Stn Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide proceedings C.No.112/GL-SDO.N(R)/2014 dated 06.06.2014 on the file of the 5th Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the same and pass ...” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on instructions would submit that no rowdy sheet is opened against the Petitioner and this writ petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is allowed. The Proceedings dated 06.06.2014 passed by respondent authorities are hereby set aside. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.12.2025 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 6868 of 2023 08.12.2025 Mjl /*