- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36940 RSA No. 490 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O HANUMABOVI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. SRI HANUMANTHU S/O LATE HANUMABOVI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT D NO.58 1ST MAIN, NACHANAHALLY PALYA MYSORE, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 008. &APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA H S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT KULLAMMA D/O LATE GIRIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. SMT KEMPAMMA W/O LATE HANUMABOVI (DEAD BY LRS THE APPELLANT NO.2 AND RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 6) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36940 RSA No. 490 of 2022 3. SRI MAHADEVA S/O LATE HANUMABOVI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.58, 1ST MAIN NACHANAHALLY PALYA MYSORE, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 008. 4. SMT ANITHA W/O LATE MAHESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 5. SRI DURGESH S/O LATE MAHESH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 6. CHIRANJEEVI S/O LATE MAHESH AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS R6 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN/NATURAL MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.4 R4 TO R6 ARE R/AT NO.107/1 3RD CROSS, NACHANAHALLY PALYA MYSORE, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 008 &RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.10.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.327/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.06.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.444/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36940 RSA No. 490 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the appellants. 2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Further, the order sheet discloses that learned counsel for the appellants was consistently absent and is not diligently pursuing the matter. 3. Appeal is of the year 2022 and yet to be admitted and suit is one for partition and came to be decreed by declaring the shares of the parties which was confirmed by the First Appellate Court which is a preliminary decree. 4. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34 CT: BHK