1 2025:CGHC:4178-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 275 of 2025 1. Meera Pandey @ Uma Pandey W/o Sunil Pandey Aged About 55 Years R/o Agrasen Ward Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. 2. Sunil Pandey S/o Kamal Narayan Pandey Aged About 68 Years R/o Agrasen Ward Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. 3. Priyesh Pandey S/o Sunil Pandey Aged About 31 Years R/o Agrasen Ward Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. 4. Priyanka Pandey W/o Rajendra Dubey Aged About 33 Years R/o Agrasen Ward Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. 5. Vinayak Sharma S/o Shashiraj Sharma Aged About 54 Years R/o Darripara, Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 2. Prakashchandra Pandey S/o Late Brijnandan Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o Agrasen Ward Deveshwar Colony, Ambikapur District Surguja, C.G. ...Respondent(s) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.23 18:29:01 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23 . 01 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Rohitashva Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No. 1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “In view of aforementioned facts and circumstances it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash First Information Report in connection with Crime No. 446 of 2023 registered in Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) and consequent investigation against the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. On perusal of the prayer in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is no mention of the offences under 3 which the impugned FIR has been lodged against the petitioners, to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visual & Hearing Impaired, Bilaspur. 6. Certified copy of the impugned FIR and other documents may be returned back to the petitioners after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan