Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51474 (AP)

Seema Viswanadham v. Seeina Kalyani

CRLRC/2643/2018 · 2025-12-07

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010729592018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2643 OF 2018 Between: 1. SEEMA VISWANADHAM, S/O RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WORKING AS SECOND GRADE TEACHER, G.S.T.M.P.E.SCHOOL, KAMALAPURAM VILLAGE, PALASA MANDAL', R/O BRAHMANATARLA VILLAGE, PALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SEEMA KALYANI, W/O VISWANADHAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, HINDI PANDIT IN ITDA, R/O KARAJADA VILLAGE, MELIAPUTTI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SEEMA LAKSHYA, D/O VISWANADHAM, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, BEING MINOR REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. SEEMA KALYANI W/O VISWANADHAM R/O KARAJADA VILLAGE, MELIAPUTTI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case against the order dt.10-8-2018 made in 2 Crl.M.P.No.1147/2017 in M.C.No.19/2017 on the file of the court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam district for the following IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders dt. 10-8-2018 made in Cr1.M.P.No.1147/2017 in M.C.No.19/2017 on the file of the court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam district pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/respondent under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 10.08.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1147 of 2017 in M.C.No.19 of 2017 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam District (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 10.08.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1147 of 2017 in M.C.No.19 of 2017. The Crl.M.P.No.1147 of 2017 has been filed by the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein under Section 125(3) of Cr.P.C. seeking for interim maintenance. By impugned order dated 10.08.2018, the trial Court allowed the petition by recording certain reasons. Against the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the present revision. 3 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main M.C.No.19 of 2017 was disposed on 29.03.2019. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said M.C.No.19 of 2017 was disposed on 29.03.2019 and it was allowed. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the M.C.No.19 of 2017 on 29.03.2019, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 08.12.2025 MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2643 of 2018 Date: 08.12.2025 MS