APHC010718782014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33567/2014 Between: 1. GAMPA VENKATA RAMANA REDDY,, S/O G.B. REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 25/2/1146( OLD 25-2-821) SIROMANI NAGAR, RVENUE COLONY, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. S.RAMESH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 25-2344 (OLD 25-2-983) (POLICE COLONY) REVENUE COLONY, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. V.RAMANJANEYA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABUT 57 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 25-2-1145(OLD 25-2-820) SIROMANI NAGAR, REVENUE COLONY, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. K.MADHUSUDHAN RAO,, S/O LATE VEERAIAH, AGED ABUT 44 YEARS, RIO D.NO.25-2-345 ( OLD 25-2-1175) POLICE COLONY, REVENUE COLONY, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. P.T.NARASIMHAN,, S/O RAMANUJAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RIO D.NO. 26-2-1169 OLD 26-2-1449) TYAGARAJA NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2 2. THE NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY ITS, COMMISSIONER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER NELLORE MUNICIPAL, CORPORATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. KALAVA SURESH KUMAR REDDY ( SC FOR MC RAYAL REGION, NELLORE) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, though the respondent authorities proposed to take up the construction on GNT road and to mark certain portions of the petitioner’s property. Subsequently, that plan was shelved and the survey report was discarded. 2. It is also stated in the written instructions that any further proposed road-widening activity would be in accordance with the procedure of law. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR