Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51469 (AP)

Surisetty Satyanarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11226/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010197612021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11226/2021 Between: 1. SURISETTY SATYANARAYANA, S/O (L) PATTALAYYA AGED 46 YRS, R/AT 46-22-44 KALYANAIESTATES , OPP. RAILWAY HOSPITAL NEAR BIG BAZAR STATION ROAD VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERSHO, DUWADA POLICE STATOIN VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SRI SAHUKARA KALYAN RAO, S/O S.GANAPATI , AGED 48 YRS EMPLOYEE, 3-127/9 ,GALLAVANIPALEM,AGANAMPUDI VISAKHAPATNAM.46. 5. SARIPALLI RAMANA, S/O (L) SRI TATALU, AGED 47 YRS D.N0.20-22- 17, SEEKUVANIPALEM, PEDAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPANAM.44. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an Order to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondnet Police particularly R-3 calling the Petitioner to the Police Station continuously by Pressuring the same to Settle the Civil Dispute in connectoin with the Property Registered Sale Deed dt. 16-5-2018 and 27-9-2017 in the name of the Unofficial Respondents R-4 and R-5 even though without 2 Registration of any Crime all are Illegal, Arbitrary, Violaton of Article 14,19,21 of the Constituton of India Consequently to direct the Respondnet Police -R-3 not to interfere nor harass the petitoiner even without registration of any crime nor following the process of Law in the interest of the justice and pass such other relief or reliefs as the honble court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondnet Police -R-3 not to interfere nor harass the petitoiner even without registration of any crime nor following the process of Law pending disposal of the main writ petiton in the interest of the justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. PALLA BALU ANIL KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11226 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue to pass an Order to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police particularly R-3 calling the Petitioner to the Police Station continuously by Pressuring the same to Settle the Civil Dispute in connection with the Property Registered Sale Deed dt. 16-5-2018 and 27-9-2017 in the name of the Unofficial Respondents R-4 and R-5 even though without Registration of any Crime all are illegal, arbitrary, violaton of Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India Consequently to direct the Respondent Police R-3 not to interfere nor harass the petitioner even without registration of any crime nor following the process of Law in the interest of the justice and pass such other relief or reliefs as the hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and to pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court vide Order dated 16.06.2021, the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 3. Sri R.Siva Sai Swarup, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. VNS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 11226 of 2021 Dated.07.10.2025 VNS 692 6