CWP-11931-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 127 MANPREET KAUR STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Ankur Sidhar Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate Ms. Komal Klana, Advocate, for respondent no.3/HPS TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed mandamus directing the respondents awarded to the petitioner in the subject knowledge test dated the post of PGT Mathematics 23.07.2024. 2. L anwersheet for the had been awarded 76 marks, whereas the total actually comes to 81. In case the marks are correctly calculated, she would be entitled to be considered for the selection. 3. On this assertion, produce the petitioner’s original answersheet of The same has been produced today calculation of marks awarded 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: MANPREET KAUR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Ankur Sidhar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate with Ms. Komal Klana, Advocate, Ms. Sheena for respondent no.3/HPSC. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to correct and recalculate the marks awarded to the petitioner in the subject knowledge test dated the post of PGT Mathematics in response to advertisement Learned counsel contended that the petitioner for the test and found that due to wrong calculation of marks, she had been awarded 76 marks, whereas the total actually comes to 81. In case the marks are correctly calculated, she would be entitled to be considered for On this assertion, Secretary of the Commission produce the petitioner’s original answersheet of he same has been produced today; its perusal shows calculation of marks awarded by the examinor. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11931-2025 Decided On: 14.05.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. with Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate inter alia, seeking a writ of to correct and recalculate the marks awarded to the petitioner in the subject knowledge test dated 23.09.2024 for in response to advertisement 28 of 2024, dated that the petitioner had inspected her to wrong calculation of marks, she had been awarded 76 marks, whereas the total actually comes to 81. In case the marks are correctly calculated, she would be entitled to be considered for Secretary of the Commission was directed to produce the petitioner’s original answersheet of the subject knowledge test. its perusal shows nothing wrong about . ...PETITIONER(s) ing a writ of to correct and recalculate the marks for of 2024, dated inspected her to wrong calculation of marks, she had been awarded 76 marks, whereas the total actually comes to 81. In case the marks are correctly calculated, she would be entitled to be considered for was directed to subject knowledge test. nothing wrong about Aman Dua 2025.05.19 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-11931-2025 4. In view thereof, there is no ground to petition and it stands dismissed 14.05.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view thereof, there is no ground to petition and it stands dismissed in limine. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No entertain the present Aman Dua 2025.05.19 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document