- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5022 WP No. 103298 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103298 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: K.SUDHA BAI AGED 79 YEARS, WIDOW OF K.ANANTHA RAO AND DAUGHTER OF SONNENAHALLI NARASINGA RAO, “SHARADA”, ASWATHAM COLONY, 4TH CROSS, SATYANARAYANA PET, BALLARI – 583 101, KARNATAKA STATE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.SHYAMSUNDAR., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), KARNATAKA, PARK HOUSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE COMPOUND, BALLARI – 583 101. BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5022 WP No. 103298 of 2023 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the petition was listed on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 19.03.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5022 WP No. 103298 of 2023 the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31