Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51455 (AP)

KONDAYAPALEM TELUGU BAPTIS CHURCH v. The state of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/40766/2022 · 2025-11-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010688452022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40766/2022 Between: 1. KONDAYAPALEM TELUGU BAPTIS CHURCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT UYYALA DASARDHA RAMAIAH DASAIA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,R/O. KONDAYAPALEM HARIJANWADA,RETIRED EMPLOYEE IN PINAKINI GRAMEENA BANK, A.K. NAGAR POST, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. AMARAVATHI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SRI NARASIMHARAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE 5TH TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , V TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. GANTA MARTHAMMA, W/O. VIJAYA BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, R/O. 26-12-1052 KONDAYAPALEM, HARIZANAWADA, A.K. NAGAR, NELLORE, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. GANTA RAVEENDRA BABU, S/O. SUBBARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 26-1-61, DALITHVADA, KONDAYAPALEM, 2 NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. NAIDU ASHOK KUMAR, S/O. DAVID. AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 26-12-1058, KONDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. PAMBADI DAVID RAJU, S/O. VIJAYA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 26-12-1058, KONDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4, in providing the police aid to Petitioner Church from 24-12-2022 to 01-01-2023, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of Article 14,20 and 21 of Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and Consequently, directing the Respondent No.2 to 4 to provide the police aid to Petitioner Church from 24-12-2022 to 01-01-2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4, to prevent the 5 to 8 respondents and her henchmen from disturbing the prayers and other activities to be going on in the Petitioner Church premises from 24-12-2022 to 01-01¬2023, as requested in representation dated 10-12-2022, Pending disposal of the writ Petition pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V V S VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40766 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4, in not providing the police aid to Petitioner Church from 24-12-2022 to 01-01-2023, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of Article 14,20 and 21 of Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and Consequently, directing the Respondent No.2 to 4 to provide the police aid to Petitioner Church from 24-12- 2022 to 01-01-2023 and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.11.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.40766 of 2022 Dated.05.11.2025 UPS 131