APHC010885642017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1139/2017 Between: 1. YERRAGOGULA PUSHPAVATHI, D/O. LATE Y.NARAYANA REDDY, R/O. MARAVAKOMMA COLONY, NEAR COLLECTORATE, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN & DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI SADDALA BOYA REDDY 4 OTHERS, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY D.NO. 4/147, NEAR VENGALAMMA NAIDU COLONY, NEAR T.V. TOWER, ANANTHAPURAM, OWNER OF LORRY BEARING NO. AP 02.V.1899 2. THE CLAIMS OFFICER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., HEAR OFFICER-III, E.S. RIICOLNDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302022 3. SMT YERRAGOGULA MANGAMMA, W/O. LATE NARAYANA REDDY 4. YERRAGOGULA SREEKANTH REDDY, S/O. LATE NARAYANA REDDY 5. YERRAGOGULA KARTHEEK REDDY, S/O. LATE NARAYANA REDDY ALL ARE R/O. D.NO. 28-1-220, MARAVAKOMMA COLONY, NEAR COLLECTORATE, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN & DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against the dismissal order in the appellant claim E.C. No. 08/2012 dated 16-5-2017 in Common Order made in EC No. 1/2010 & E.C.No. 8/2012 on the file of the Commissioner for Employee's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Ananthapuram. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 1962 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 92 days in preferring the CMA and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CMAMP 1963 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein or her representatives if any on behalf of her minor Children not to withdraw the claim amount deposited before the Commissioner for Employees' Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour at Ananthapuram by the respondents 1 and 2 herein in EC No. 1/2010 for the accidental death of the father of the Petitioner herein late Y.Narayana Reddy till the disposal of this CMA and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. G UMAPATHI SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GUDI SRINIVASU 2. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1139/2017 JUDGMENT: On 23.07.2025, learned counsel for the appellant informed this Court that he had issued no objection to the party and he had no instructions in the matter. 2. Again on 06.08.2025, when the matter was listed, none appeared for the appellant, therefore, the appeal was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Despite the same, none appears for the appellant even today. Appellant therefore appears to be not interested in pursuing the appeal. 3. Sri Gudi Srinivas, learned counsel appears for the respondents. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 06th October, 2025 RKS