Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51431 (ALL)

PAWAN AGRAWAL @ PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/629/2017 · 2025-09-14

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 629 of 2017 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant (s). 3. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned AGA for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants-Pawan Agrawal @ Pawan Kumar Agrawal with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 21.11.2016 as well as prosecution of the applicant u/s 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C., and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Konch, District Jalaun pending before Judicial Magistrate, Konch, District Jalaun as Complaint Case No.620 of 2016, Smt. Pooja Agrawal Vs. Pawan Agrawal and others and further to stay the further proceeding of aforesaid complaint case during the pendency application before this Hon'ble Court. 5. This matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 10.1.2017 subject to deposit of Rs. 20,000/-by the applicants. As per report of the Mediation Centre dated 7.4.2017, the applicants have not deposited the said money before the Centre till 6.4.2017. 6. In view of the same, this matter is reported by the office through the report dated 4.2.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhay Krishna Agrawal, Sanjay Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pawan Agrawal @ Pawan Kumar Agrawal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. September 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls A482 No. 629 of 2017 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad