SRI SIDDAPPA S/O. YALLAPPA KAMAKAR, v. SRI H RAMANAGOUDAR
CCC/100154/2025 · 2025-06-19
K V Aravind, R Devdas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5143 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5143 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7810-DB CCC No. 100154 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100154 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SIDDAPPA S/O. YALLAPPA KAMAKAR, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC.: RETIRED TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, R/O. AASARONI, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI, TALUK: HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580001.
2.
SRI. RAVINDRA S/O. SHANKRAPPA BULLI, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC.: RETIRED ARTISAN, R/O. SIDDESHWAR NAGAR, 2ND CROSS, UNKAL, HUBBALLI, TALUK. HUBBALL, DIST. DHARWAD-580001. - COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI VINAYKUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. H. RAMANAGOUDAR AGE. MAJOR, OCC. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.R.T.C. HUBBALLI RURAL DIVISION, 4TH FLOOR, C.B.T. BUS TERMINAL, HUBBALLI-580020, TQ.: HUBBALLI, DIST.: DHARWAD. - ACCUSED (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC. 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSON FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED IN W.P. NO.101543/2024 (S- KSRTC) AND 101544/2024 (S-KSRTC), DATED 19.07.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.06.20 09:58:35 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7810-DB CCC No. 100154 of 2025
THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
Learned counsel Sri Prashant S. Hosmani appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3 has filed compliance report.
Learned counsel for the petitioners/ complainants has gone through the compliance affidavit and on instructions the learned counsel submits that the petitioners are satisfied with the action taken by the respondents.
Accordingly the contempt petition stands closed.
Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE BVV CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2