HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 2740/2021 CM No. 9286/2021 Rakhmat Bi and Ors. ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Naheim Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Waheed Choudhary, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 06.08.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the instant petition, the respondents have rejected the case of the petitioners and, accordingly, he seeks some time to workout his remedy challenging the order of rejection and he further submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous in light of the same. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. However, petitioners are at liberty to challenge the order of rejection, if so advised by way of appropriate remedy under law. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 06.08.2025 Mihul Sr. No. 3 Mihul Singh 2025.08.07 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document