Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51421 (CHH)

M/S ENVIROCARE INTERNATIONAL (CHHATTISGARH) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5195/2025 · 2025-10-05

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49558 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5195 of 2025 1 - M/s Envirocare International (Chhattisgarh), A Company Duly Registered Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act 1956, Having Its Office At 105, Ground Floor, Dss Commercial Complex Near Old R.T.O. And Lovina Courts Mungeli Naka, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Bilaspur Collectorate Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Bpcl) Through Its Chairman And Managing Director 4 And 6, Currimbhoy Road Callard Estate Mumbai Maharashtra ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No. 4 & 5 : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 06/10/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs: “10.1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record from the respondents concerning award of any development work to respondent no. 6 for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing the respondent authorities to strictly maintain a buffer of more than 500 meters with no other work in the adjacent land as is a mandate under the guidelines from the facility of the petitioner. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ restraining respondent no. 6 from carrying out any development work adjacent to the common bio-medical waste management facility of the petitioner. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts 3 and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent no. 3 and 4 to decide the representation dated 18.08.2025 (Annexure P/4) made by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsels for the respective respondents opposes the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of the petitioner, respondent no. 3 and 4 is directed to decide the representation dated 18.08.2025 Annexure P/4 filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, rules and regulations expeditiously, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to Respondent no. 6. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima