[2025:RJ-JP:6719] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 1397/2025 Govind Singh S/o Devisingh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bamori, Police Station Sarthal, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Bhawna Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/02/2025 1. This third bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.288/2023 registered at Police Station Sarthal, District Baran for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 302, 504 IPC. 2. Counsel for petitioner states that at the time of dismissal of second bail application vide order dated 23.07.2024, liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after recording statements of injured witnesses namely Bharat Singh, Rohit @ Gajendra and Devendra. The statements of all three injured witnesses have been recorded during course of trial; Petitioner is behind bars since 30.01.2023; there are no criminal antecedents of petitioner and conclusion of trial may take a considerable time, therefore, petitioner be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and states that the injured witnesses Bharat Singh, who happens to be [2025:RJ-JP:6719] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1397/2025] son of deceased Jagdish has levelled allegation against the petitioner to inflict injury to the deceased on his head by iron rod and the iron rod was recovered from the petitioner. He further states that out of 17 prosecution witnesses, 9 witnesses have been examined and remaining witnesses are Government witnesses, who shall be examined earliest possible. 4. Having considered the rival submission of both parties and in view of specific allegation against the petitioner to inflict injury by iron rod and recovery of iron rod from the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. 5. Accordingly, instant third bail application is dismissed. 6. However, learned Public Prosecutor shall ensure to examine the remaining prosecution witnesses at the earliest and the Sessions Court shall make an endeavor to conclude the trial of the case as early as possible. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /37