Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5142 (AP)

Mahesh Kumar Thangam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/874/2025 · 2025-02-06

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAI THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY _~','1 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESE-N-T.: I--I-I I I lvL 't!?i. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA RED'b€ .vI`ADL[ Ol`WuO I IuE r` SREEN[VASA REDng CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 874 OF 2025 Between : Oa" Mahesh Kumar Thangam, s/o Thangam, Aged about 37 years, occ. Business, R/o Kurumariyamman Kovil Street, Thuvakudi Malai North, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, Tamilnadu state. Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State ofAndhra pradeshH Rep. by I-tS Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra pradesh at Amaravati. Respondenvcomplainant petI|tjOn under Sections 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C(New Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya NagarI'k Suraksha sanhI®ta,2023), is filed praying that jn the cI-rCumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitI'Oner/ accused No.1 on bail pending trial in crime No.115/2024 of Hukumpeta poII'Ce Station. The petI-tl'On coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri B PARAMESEWARA RAO, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent, the court made the followI'ng ORDER + ir ++ `++ APHCOI OO41742O25 rr IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 874/2025 Betwee n : Mahesh Kumar Thangam ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/A1, seeking regular bail, in Crime No,115 of 2024 of Hukumpeta Police Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju district. <~- tag t_ _= \\ I/ 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under Section 111(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short {the NDPS Act'). 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 24.ll.2024, at about 09.00 hours, on credible information, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Hukumpeta Police Station, along with his staff and mediators, proceeded to Konthill junction, Hukumpeta Mandal and found Al and A2 in possession and illegal transportation of 10 Kgs of Ganja in an auto. The contraband along with the vehicle and other material was seized under cover of a mediators report and a case has been registered aga'lnst the accused. Al and A2 confessed about the involvement of A3 and A4 in this crime. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. Petitioner was arrested on 24.ll.2024 and since then he is in judicial remand. The quantity of Ganja allegedly seized from the possession of the accused is 10 Kgs, which is not a t=xp. L-ls\ +++i+?+++; `\ --`\ 3 // commercial quantity. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that major portion of investigation has been completed,. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/Al on the following conditions. i) The petitioner/Al shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two suretl'es of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First class, Paderu. ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e., on every Saturday between 10.00 am and 01.00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet. l'ii) Petitioner herein/Al shall not go beyond the jurisdiction of Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh State, without leave of the trial Court and he shall make available` his location through mobile phone by pairing it with the mobile phone of the 'Investigating Officer round the clock. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition iS allowed- Sd/-P.U.V. B ASS]STAN H/4SkAR RAG T&G!STRAR i /ITRUE COPY// SEC"ON OFFICER To'1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Paderu- 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, VisakhaPatnam, 3, The SHO.,Hukumpeta P.S., Alluri Sitharama Raju D'lstriCt. 4, One CC to SRl. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, H'lgh Court Of A.P [OPUC] 6. One spare copy psk I \-= HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :06/02/2O25 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.874 of 2025 ALLOWED aCLSi I `!'` i= g-ggrggr§*`.y& -i_-i-i==:_-_:_-:-i:--i---:--:i- _ EBB \\\1\ st+ife