1 2025:CGHC:55075 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12396 of 2025 • Dhananjay Kumar Soni S/o Late Bihari Lal Soni Aged About 48 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Soil Conservation Officer, Manendragarh, And Distt. Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director Directorate Of Agriculture, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Secretary General Administration Department, C.G. Government, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Mahesh Paikra Assistant Director Of Agriculture (Ada), From Deputy Director Of Agriculture Office, Gariaband, Distt. Gariaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha and Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocates. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 2 12/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order 30-6-2025 whereby he has been transferred from Chirimiri, Bharatpur, District Manendragarh to Narayanpur, District Narayanpur 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner who is working as Assistant Soil Conservation Officer at Manendragarh, District Manendragarh ChirmiriBharatpur has been transferred to Narayanpur, District Narayanpur which is a remote forest core Scheduled Area and 600 kms away. He would further submit that the petitioner is suffering from 40% permanent locomotor disability, therefore, he may be allowed to make a representation before the concerned respondent authority for considering the posting of the petitioner at nearby place. 3. Considering the fact that the petitioner is suffering from 40% permanent locomotor disability, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authority to post him at nearby place which may be considered and decided by the respondent authority, in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.13 11:53:22 +0530