MD.KHURSED ALAM@KHURSED ALAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(A)/24/2025 · 2025-01-21
Gaurang Kanth, Joymalya Bagchi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51410 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51410 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
21.01.2025 Ct. No.1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Sl. No.29
Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri akd [Rejected] C. R. M. (A) 24 of 2025
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 06.12.2024 in connection with Phansidewa Police Station Case No.252 of 2024 dated 04.07.2024 under Sections 85/117(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (G.R. Case No.2029 of 2024)
And
In Re: Md. Khursed Alam @ Khursed Alam
… … Petitioner
Mr. Sudip Guha
… … for the petitioner
Mr. Ujjwal Luksom
Ms. Namrata Das
… … for the State
1. Heard learned Advocates for both the parties.
2. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner is the husband of the victim lady. He had tortured the victim. As a result, she attempted to commit suicide. In view of the nature of allegations, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.)
(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)