VIJESH KUMARI D/O SHRI SATYAVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1796/2025 · 2025-03-04
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1796/2025 Vijesh Kumari D/o Shri Satyaveer, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Ward No.11, Soansar, Jhunjhunu(Rajasthan) Licensee Composite Liquor Shop (0105021),ward No.6, Purvi Mohalla, Village Badet, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Finance (Excise) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Joint Secretary, Finance (Excise) Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur(Rajasthan).
3. Commissioner, Excise Department, Government Of Rajasthan, 2, Gumaniyawala, Panchwati, Udaipur, (Rajasthan).
4. District Excise Officer, Jhunjhunu, Indra Nagar, Ajmer (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Najeeb Anwar Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/03/2025
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a challenge has been made by the petitioner to the Recovery Notice/ Order dated 07.11.2024, passed by the District Excise Officer (Recovery), Jhunjhunu, asking to deposit dues of annual security amount of Rs.9,87,277/- along with interest.
[2025:RJ-JP:9352] (2 of 2) [CW-1796/2025]
2. During course of arguments, counsel for petitioner does not dispute that the order of recovery, passed by the District Excise Officer is appealable under Section 9-A of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, subject to deposition of 25% of the demanded amount.
3. Counsel for petitioner admits that petitioner has directly preferred this writ petition, without availing the opportunity of filing an appeal, however, having instructions from the petitioner, counsel for petitioner is agreeable to approach before the Appellate Authority i.e. the Excise Commissioner, if the delay during this period is condoned and his appeal is allowed to be heard on merits.
4. In view of above, without going into merits/ demerits of the impugned recovery notice/ order dated 07.11.2024, petitioner is relegated to avail the alternative and statutory remedy of appeal thereagainst, as provided under Section 9-A of the Rajasthan Excise Act,1950. It is hereby directed that in case, petitioner files an appeal within a period of 30 days from today and complies with the condition precedent, i.e. to deposit the 25% of the demanded recovery amount, his appeal be heard and considered on merits ignoring the delay.
5. Accordingly, instant writ petition is disposed of, in order to avail the alternative remedy available in law.
6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /13