LOKNATH S/O. TIKARAM VERMA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO, PS MIDC, NAGPUR, DIST. NAGPUR AND ANOTHER.
APL/945/2023 · 2025-05-08
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51398 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51398 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 941.J.apl.945.2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.945 OF 2023
1. Loknath s/o Tikaram Verma, aged about 67 years, Occ. Agriculturist, r/o House No. 51, Ward No. 3, Udaan, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh – 491 888
2. Ramkali Ramesh Janghal, aged about 43 years, Occ. Home maker, r/o Plot No. 151, Netaji Nagar, Near Nagpure School, Bhandewadi, Nagpur – 440 035.
3. Smt. Soni Manoj Verma, aged about 29 years, Occ. Home maker, r/o Ward No. 3, udan, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, - 491 888
4. Manoj s/o Loknath Verma, aged about 39 years, Occ. Agriculturist, r/o Plot No. 151, Netaji Nagar, Near Nagpure School, Bhandewadi, Nagpur – 440 035 ... APPLICANTS VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station MIDC, Nagpur, Dist. Nagpur.
2. Shraddha Shamlal Verma, Aged about 25 years, r/o Plot No. 23, Vaishali Nagar, Hingna Road, Police Station MIDC, Nagpur.
… NON-APPLICANT(S). 2025:BHC-NAG:5209-DB
2 941.J.apl.945.2023.odt _____________________________________________________________ Shri A.A. Choube, Advocate for the applicants. Shri A.R. Chutake, Addl.P.P. for the State. Shri J.Shukla, Advocate for non-applicant no.2. ______________________________________________________________
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR
AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 08.05.
2025.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : Anil S. Kilor, J.) RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. By this application, the applicants are seeking quashment of charge-sheet No.42 of 2022 arising out of First Information Report No.0581 of 2021 registered with the MIDC Police Station, Nagpur City for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is the case of the prosecution is that, after non-applicant No.2’s marriage, she was subjected to physical and mental harassment at the hand of the applicants, who are the father-in-law and sister-in-law. Thus, on the basis of these allegations, the FIR came to be registered against them.
4.
Learned Counsel for the applicants and learned Counsel for non-applicant no. 2 made a joint statement that the matter has been
3 941.J.apl.945.2023.odt settled before the learned Mediator and for the said reasons, non- applicant no.2 does not want to prosecute against the present applicants.
5. Since the parties have settled their dispute before the learned Mediator and the report of the same is filed on the record, continuation of prosecution in such case will not yield any fruitful purpose. Accordingly, we pass the following order : (a) The Criminal Application is allowed. (b) Charge-sheet No.42 of 2022 arising out of First Information Report No.0581 of 2021 registered with the MIDC Police Station, Nagpur City for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, is hereby quash and set aside against the present applicants.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J. ) (ANIL S. KILOR
, J. ) Trupti