REDDAM VENKATA RAMANA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15089/2023 · 2025-12-04
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51392 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51392 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010294722023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15089/2023 Between:
1. REDDAM VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. H. NO 1/8, CHEMULLAPALLI VILLAGE, KHAZIPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, , KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2
6. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KHAZIPET, KADAPA DISTRICT
7. THE CHEMULLAPALLE GRAM PANCHAYAT, KHAZIPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY- CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 8. THE SARPANCH, CHEMULLAPALLE GRAM PANCHAYAT, KHAZIPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the final bill amount of Rs.2,67,174/- to the petitioner for supplying material to the work Providing internal CC Roads including drainage system within village under convergence funds at Location Ramalayam to Cell Tower in Chemullapalle Village and Gram Panchayat, vide work ID No. 117061318016080032 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to release amount of Rs.2,67,174/-, to the petitioner along with interest forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release amount of Rs.2,67,174/-, to the petitioner along with interest forthwith, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT
3
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3.
GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amount to the petitioner for Providing internal CC roads including drainage system within village under convergence funds at Location Ramalayam to Cell Tower in Chemullapalle Village and Gram Panchayat, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for the respondents. 3. Smt Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, on written instructions dated 05.12.2025 submitted that the amounts claimed by the petitioner have been paid. 4. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter. 5. Taking their submissions into consideration, as the authorities have paid the entitled amounts to the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed. 4
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 05th December, 2025 RKS