1 2025:CGHC:49993-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3053 of 2025 1. Atul Kumar Singh S/o Rajendra Bahadur Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Qr. No. G-16 Sada Colony, Niharika, Tahsil And District- Korba (C.G.) 2. Rajendra Bahadur Singh S/o Baj Bahadur Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Jheriya, P.S. Janehi, District- Riwa (M.P.) 3. Smt. Sunetra Singh W/o Rajendra Bahadur Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Jheriya, P.S. Janehi, District- Riwa (M.P.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Mahila Thana- Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Aarti Singh W/o Atul Kumar Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o E-124, Samridhhi Colony, Bodri, Chakrabhatha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Shailendra Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08/10/2025 JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.09 10:29:31 +0530 2 1. Heard Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Addl. A.G. for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and quashed the impugned FIR No. 86/2024, the cognizance order passed by learned JMFC, Bilaspur on dated 03.04.2025 and entire criminal proceeding against the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as the offences under which the FIR is lodged is not mentioned in the prayer clause. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court for wasting precious time fo the court and the said amount shall be 3 transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners/State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti